📰The Truth Toolkit: Fact-Checking Resources for Informed Resistance

Understanding where to find reliable fact-checking resources is more critical than ever.

Below is a list of 10 major fact-checking organizations that help verify claims made in news, social media, politics, or popular culture.

These organizations follow journalistic and fact-checking standards, though perspectives on their reliability may vary. Checking multiple sources can provide a more comprehensive view. * I frequently check these media.

🧩 This is the first post in a short series about truth, media bias, and fact-checking. See Evaluating the Evaluators for Part 2.

Fact-Checking Organizations

Reuters Fact Check – Part of Reuters news agency, investigates viral claims and images with strict journalistic standards.

AP Fact Check (Associated Press) – Offers straightforward investigations of political and social claims.

FactCheck.org * – A nonpartisan, nonprofit fact-checking project focused on U.S. politics.

Full Fact (UK) – Independent UK-based fact-checking organization emphasizing transparency.

AFP Fact Check – Agence France-Presse covers global misinformation, especially on social media.

BBC Verify – A BBC News team focused on fact-checking, visual analysis, and verifying information before and after publication.

PolitiFact * – Known for its “Truth-O-Meter,” which also appears as a widget on their website and app, helping readers evaluate political statements on the go.

Snopes – One of the oldest fact-checking sites, originally focused on urban legends and now covering political claims.

The Washington Post Fact Checker – Evaluates statements by public figures and awards “Pinocchios” based on falsehood levels.

USA TODAY Fact Check – Reviews viral claims, social media posts, and political developments.

⚠️ Suspicious or Questionable ‘Fact-Checking’ Initiatives

Not every effort that calls itself “fact-checking” is reliable. Some are designed to mislead or lack the standards of professional journalism.

Global Fact-Checking Network (GFCN) — Launched in 2024 as a supposed international alliance of fact-checkers, GFCN is widely considered a Russian state-controlled propaganda project. Rather than correcting misinformation, it spreads state-sponsored narratives under the guise of credibility.

Social Media Crowdsourced Systems — Platforms like Facebook/Instagram (Meta’s Community Notes), X (formerly Twitter, with Community Notes now partially AI-assisted), and TikTok (Footnotes) have introduced volunteer-driven fact-checking features. While these systems may flag obvious falsehoods, they rely on random users instead of trained fact-checkers and are vulnerable to manipulation. Their effectiveness remains unproven, and they should be used cautiously.

Note: These features are built into their platforms and not available as standalone resources. I’m not linking to them here to avoid giving questionable efforts more visibility.

➡️ Tip: Always cross-check claims flagged by these questionable sources with the independent, professional fact-checking organizations listed earlier.

Using These Resources Effectively

Bookmark these websites and use them to verify questionable claims.

Cross-check across multiple fact-checking sources for a more nuanced view.

Remember that all fact-checking organizations operate with some degree of interpretation—stay informed and think critically.

Watch for impersonators: Fake fact-checkers and spoofed versions of trusted sites have become more common. Double-check URLs and use bookmarks to return to verified sources.

By relying on credible fact-checking organizations and cross-referencing information, we can strengthen our ability to discern truth from misinformation and engage in fact-based discussions.

---

Share
If you find this resource useful, please share it with friends.

Subscribe
Get new posts from Plainly, Garbl delivered to your inbox.