✍️ The MAGA Threat and What Comes Next
Exclusion, grievance, and authoritarian drift demand informed resistance
Setting the Stage
MAGA isn’t a party or a club; it’s a movement bound together by grievance, loyalty to Trump, and a shared sense of cultural siege. The core themes keep circling back to identity and power:
Trump himself. He’s not just the leader but the cult figure, the un-American idol at the heart of their devotion. Sometimes he channels the crowd’s rage; other times he stokes it, and they follow. It’s a feedback loop—he validates their fears; they validate his dominance. For many, MAGA is less about conservative ideology and more about him as a leader, symbol, and perceived outsider who “fights for them.”
Distrust of institutions. Media, universities, the federal government, public health, even the military brass—all painted as enemies conspiring against them. Respect is conditional: The FBI is heroic until it investigates Trump; the courts are legitimate until they uphold charges against him.
Election grievance. The “stop the steal” narrative lingers, driving efforts to rig the system in their favor—through restrictive voting laws, purges of election officials, challenges to certification, and the idea that no loss can be legitimate.
Immigration and borders. Calls for strict enforcement, building barriers (walls), mass deportations, and casting immigrants as threats to safety, jobs, and culture.
Cultural flashpoints:
Book bans, especially targeting LGBTQ+ and racial justice titles (though often framed as protecting kids from “pornography” or “indoctrination”).
Efforts to preserve or restore Confederate statues and the names of military bases.
Pushback against museums or cultural institutions that highlight marginalized histories focusing on race, gender, and social justice.
Campaigns against diversity, equity, and inclusion, framed as protecting fairness but in practice gutting diversity programs.
Nationalism and nostalgia. “America First” bleeds into resentment of globalization, climate policies, and anything branded as “woke.” Emphasis on traditional values, Christianity, gun rights, and suspicion of multiculturalism. The imagined past is whiter, straighter, more Christian—and that past becomes the rallying point.
Hostility to “wokeness.” Resistance to LGBTQ+ rights, racial justice movements, and diversity initiatives, often framed as threats to free speech or traditional culture.
Economic anxiety reframed as grievance. Economic fears twisted into resentment. Anger at job loss and elites, but also resistance to regulations and taxes that are seen as threats to their livelihoods.
Law and order, with caveats. Strong for police crackdowns and harsh sentencing, but dismissive when law enforcement or courts act against Trump and his allies.
So: MAGA borrows the Christian Right’s evangelical moral crusading from the 1980s-2000s, driven by abortion, school prayer, and “family values”; the Pat Buchanan-style “America First” protectionist trade, hardline immigration stance in the 1990s; and the Tea Party’s anti-government/anti-Obamacare edge from 2009-2015.
But unlike those earlier movements, it fuses everything through Trump’s persona, with him and his supporters pushing and pulling each other in a cycle of outrage.
There’s plenty of variation—some supporters are more libertarian, some more evangelical, some just bonded by resentment of “the establishment.” But those are the chords you keep hearing across the spectrum.
And bigotry is the undercurrent. Whether through open hostility to immigrants, suspicion of Muslims, rejection of systemic racism, or attacks on LGBTQ+ rights, exclusion is a consistent thread—even if many supporters insist it’s just “common sense.” Those are all forms of prejudice or exclusion, whether people wearing the MAGA hat call it that or not.
Here’s how those themes turn concrete once they move from rally chants to lawmaking and executive action:
Elections and voting
State-level bills tightening voter ID laws, limiting mail-in ballots, and cutting drop boxes.
Attempts to replace or pressure local election officials, sometimes with Trump loyalists.
Efforts in Congress to curtail federal oversight of state elections.
Immigration and borders
Pushes for funding (or re-funding) the border wall.
Expansions of detention centers and attempts at mass deportation authority.
Bans on asylum claims, narrowing legal immigration pathways.
Culture and education
“Parents’ rights” bills leading to book bans in schools and libraries.
Restrictions on teaching about race, gender, and sexuality (“Don’t Say Gay,” “critical race theory” laws).
Moves to defund or ban diversity, equity, and inclusion offices in universities, government agencies, and even private companies.
State and local fights over monuments, Confederate names, and museum content.
Law and order
Mandatory minimum sentencing and expanded police powers.
“Back the Blue” protections—laws shielding officers from accountability lawsuits.
Resistance to gun regulations, often tied to the Second Amendment as cultural identity.
Nationalism and governance
Tariffs and protectionist trade policies.
Blocking climate policies seen as threats to fossil fuel jobs.
Attempts to gut federal agencies (“drain the swamp”), often by weakening civil service protections.
Reviving culture-war themes in military policy (like opposing renaming bases or restricting diversity training).
Trump-specific loyalty politics
State resolutions condemning investigations or indictments of him.
Pledges by candidates not to recognize election results they deem “rigged.”
Legislative hearings amplifying conspiracy theories (e.g., election fraud, Hunter Biden, “weaponization” of DOJ).
Put together, it’s less a coherent governing program than a set of demands to protect “their” America and punish perceived enemies. That’s why you see so many cultural skirmishes elevated into national battles—they’re symbolic, and symbols are fuel.
Project 2025
What MAGA chants at rallies, the conservative Heritage Foundation drafted into a governing blueprint—Project 2025, an authoritarian plan to roll back civil rights, dismantle federal protections, and concentrate power in the executive branch.
The tension for democracy
This raises the hard question: Can Republicans and Democrats, conservatives and progressives, find common ground?
We have to be blunt. Some things cannot be compromised. Some values are not up for negotiation. Bigotry, authoritarian power grabs, and erasure of marginalized voices cannot be compromised. Those lines and likely others cannot be crossed.
Yet there are shared concerns and everyday realities beneath the noise: how to pay the bills, keep jobs, afford school, and grow old with security. Those economic pressures bind us, even when politics tries to tear us apart.
The crossroads
If we refuse to face this divide, the alternatives look bleak. The road ahead is ugly.
Political violence is no longer unimaginable. It has already appeared on Jan. 6, 2021, in threats against election officials and public servants, and in continued random shootings. History shows where cycles of violence lead, and it is not to a stronger democracy.
The other path is harder but essential: fight where we must, accept disagreement where we can, and seize common ground before it disappears.
That’s not reconciliation, but it may be enough to keep democracy alive—even as MAGA-aligned majorities already govern in many state legislatures and wield influence in Congress—until the next election.
Values and non-negotiables
Still, any search for common ground has limits. We must be clear. Dignity, fairness, and inclusion are not bargaining chips. They are the ground rules of a free society.
Wanting peace does not mean staying quiet while neighbors are targeted or rights are stripped away. “Agreeing to disagree” only works if everyone’s basic humanity is respected. Without that baseline, politics becomes domination, not democracy.
The paradox is real: to be peace-loving while refusing to normalize bigotry. That tension may be the central challenge for anyone who cares about both conflict resolution and democracy.
What now?
There are no neat answers, no quick fixes. But silence and resignation are not options.
If we are to avoid a slide into violence or authoritarianism, we must take the challenging path: living side by side with people we disagree with, holding fast to our values, and remembering that coexistence—however uneasy—is better than surrender or civil war.
That means showing up and speaking out—in our communities, in our statehouses, in the voting booth. It means resisting lies with facts, bigotry with solidarity, and fear with courage. It means organizing, persuading, and turning out in greater numbers than those who would strip away rights.
The work is underway. But more is needed. We cannot wait for 2026 or 2028 to defend democracy; we must prepare for those elections today—with credible, persuasive candidates who can win.
The choice is clear: informed resistance or submission to authoritarian rule.
If we care about democracy, the choice is not just obvious; it is urgent. Act now or watch freedom slip away.
Resources for taking action
🧭 Advocacy Groups by Issue—Where passion meets purpose — and information becomes action.
🧰 Activism Tools—Step-by-step guides, toolkits, and platforms for effective organizing.
🏛️ Government Resources—Tools and directories: Know who to contact, how to reach them, and what they’re responsible for.
Share. If my commentary resonates with you, please share it with friends.
Subscribe. Get new posts from Plainly, Garbl delivered to your inbox.