Plainly, Garbl: 🏛️ Government Resources

🏛️ What Presidents Can—and Cannot—Do

Gary B. Larson — Sun, 14 Jun 2026 16:01:55 GMT

The U.S. president is not a king. Our country’s founders revolted against a foreign king because they believed citizens should have the right and power to govern themselves.

No single person is wise or compassionate enough to rule a people without restraint. History has proved that too often.

That restraint is built into the U.S. Constitution with its separation of powers among the three federal branches, the states, and citizens themselves. The Constitution gives each branch powers, duties, and limits.

That is not a weakness in the system. It is one of the system’s main safeguards. Those limits matter regardless of party, ideology, or personality.

Of course, the president is the head of the executive branch. That means the president has real authority over federal departments, agencies, officers, and national priorities.

But the Constitution does not merely give the president power. It also gives the president responsibilities. Presidents must agree to those limits before taking office, as stated in Article II, Section 1.

The president must swear or affirm in the oath of office to “faithfully execute the Office of President” and to “preserve, protect and defend the Constitution.” Article II, Section 3, also requires the president to “take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed.”

Those words matter.

The Take Care Clause is especially important. It means the president is responsible for seeing that federal laws are carried out. It does not mean the president may rewrite those laws, ignore them, or enforce only the parts the president personally favors.

The president leads the executive branch. The president does not own the law.

In my view, a president who refuses to obey valid laws is not faithfully executing the office. A president cannot take care that the laws are faithfully executed while claiming a personal right to ignore them.

Of course, that requirement should apply to every president, including Donald Trump.

Constitutional powers of the president

Article II, Section 2 and Section 3, give the president major powers. Some belong mainly to the president. Others require action by Congress or the Senate.

The president can:

Serve as commander in chief of the armed forces.
Require written opinions from heads of executive departments.
Grant reprieves and pardons for federal offenses, except in cases of impeachment.
Make treaties, with approval from two-thirds of senators present.
Nominate ambassadors, judges, Cabinet officers, and other federal officials, usually with Senate confirmation.
Fill some vacancies temporarily during Senate recesses.
Receive ambassadors and other public ministers and conduct diplomacy.
Recommend legislation and policy measures to Congress.
Sign or veto bills passed by Congress.
Convene Congress in extraordinary circumstances.
Commission officers of the United States.

Those powers are significant. Presidents shape national policy, direct federal agencies, influence foreign affairs, and make decisions that affect millions of people.

But much presidential power depends on laws passed by Congress, funding approved by Congress, Senate confirmation of officers, court review of decisions, and the actions of federal agencies carrying out lawful authority.

The president leads the executive branch

The executive branch is large because the federal government is large. Cabinet departments and federal agencies administer laws on health, labor, education, transportation, agriculture, national security, civil rights, immigration, environmental protection, consumer safety, taxation, veterans’ services, and much more.

Presidents set priorities for that branch. They appoint leaders. They direct agencies. They issue policies. They decide how to use lawful discretion.

But agencies do not exist simply because a president wants them. Congress creates federal departments and agencies, defines many of their powers, funds them, oversees them, and can revise the laws they administer.

The president may steer the executive ship. Congress built much of the ship, controls much of the fuel, and can change the rules of navigation.

Executive orders and other presidential actions

Executive orders are one tool presidents use to direct the executive branch.

An executive order is a written presidential directive, usually aimed at federal agencies and officials. It may guide how agencies carry out existing law, organize federal operations, or set priorities within the president’s legal authority.

Presidents also use memoranda, proclamations, national security directives, signing statements, policy guidance, and other written actions. Federal agencies may then issue rules, guidance, enforcement priorities, or program changes.

These actions can matter a great deal. They can affect immigration enforcement, civil rights enforcement, federal employees, contractors, public lands, national security, emergency response, and agency priorities.

But they are not all the same thing.

A presidential speech is not a law, and a news release is not a statute. An executive order is not a constitutional amendment, and an agency rule is different from an act of Congress.

A presidential action does not become valid just because it is written on White House letterhead. It must rest on legal authority.

What presidents cannot do alone

Presidents cannot lawfully do everything they announce, promise, or demand.

A president cannot:

Amend the Constitution by executive order.
Repeal or rewrite laws passed by Congress.
Spend money Congress has not authorized or appropriated.
Give agencies powers Congress has not provided.
Override valid court orders.
Command federal officials to violate the Constitution.
Eliminate rights protected by the Constitution.
Turn personal preference into federal law.
Ignore the Constitution, even in the name of urgency.
Replace Congress as the lawmaking branch.
Treat public office as personal power.

Congress can respond through legislation, appropriations, oversight, confirmation, and impeachment. See What Congress Controls That Presidents Don’t.

And later presidents can revise or revoke executive actions, especially when those actions are based on presidential discretion rather than a statute.

The announcement is not the end of the story.

Where the courts matter

Courts also limit presidential power. When executive actions are challenged, courts may decide whether the president or an agency acted within constitutional and statutory limits. Courts can block unlawful executive actions, interpret federal laws, enforce constitutional rights, and require agencies to follow proper procedures.

Courts do not review every presidential decision. Some disputes are political, discretionary, or difficult for courts to resolve. But when the law gives courts a role, they can be a major check on executive power.

The courts do not always get it right, however. The political philosophies of individual court members can influence their interpretation of the Constitution, its history, other court decisions, laws enacted by Congress, and actions of the executive branch.

In my view, the Supreme Court’s 2024 presidential-immunity decision was wrong because it weakened a basic principle of constitutional government: No president should be above the law. The ruling remains part of constitutional law unless changed by future court decisions, legislation where possible, or constitutional amendment.

Citizens, Congress, state governments, advocates, lawyers, scholars, and the news media all have roles in reviewing court decisions, challenging harmful rulings, and seeking lawful ways to change them.

What citizens can do

When a president or federal agency acts, citizens do not have to stand aside.

You can:

Read the actual executive order, memorandum, proclamation, rule, or agency notice.
Look for the legal authority the action claims.
Contact your members of Congress.
Submit public comments on proposed federal rules.
Follow court challenges from reliable legal and news sources.
Support watchdog, civil rights, public-interest, and accountability organizations.
Vote in federal, state, and local elections.
Keep asking whether public officials are following the law, not just whether they are getting their way.

Executive power is real. So are its limits.

The job of citizens is to remember both.

Related Resources at Plainly, Garbl

How to Contact Federal Officials—and Be Heard

U.S. Cabinet-level Departments and the Executive Office of the President

What Congress Controls That Presidents Don’t

The U.S. Constitution and the Judicial Branch

Subscribe now

🏛️ What Congress Controls That Presidents Don’t

Gary B. Larson — Wed, 10 Jun 2026 17:02:26 GMT

Presidents dominate the news.

They hold rallies, sign executive orders, command the military, appoint officials, issue pardons, and speak with the loudest single voice in American government.

But the president is not the whole government.

That should be obvious. Yet President Trump keeps acting as if executive power can override laws, reshape institutions, punish opponents, redirect public money, and bend the federal government to his will.

Too many members of Congress have let him test those limits without the resistance their constitutional duties require—especially members of his own party.

The U.S. Constitution gives Congress enormous powers that are just as central to the country’s direction.

That matters all the time. It matters even more when a president pushes beyond the traditional boundaries of the office. And it matters when Congress lets him.

Congress is not a decorative branch of government. It is not a complaint department. It is not there merely to applaud, object, investigate after the damage is done, or appear on cable news.

Congress has power

Many of Congress’s core powers are listed in Article I, Section 8, of the Constitution. It does more than list technical powers. It gives Congress authority over much of national life. Among other things, Congress may:

Raise revenue, borrow on the nation’s credit, pay debts, and fund public purposes, including the general welfare and national defense.
Regulate commerce among states and with other nations, shaping the rules for trade, business, labor, and markets.
Set immigration and naturalization rules, including the process for immigrants becoming citizens.
Manage national currency by coining money, regulating its value, and punishing counterfeiting.
Create a national postal system by establishing post offices and post roads.
Promote knowledge, scientific discovery, creativity, and invention by protecting copyrights and patents for limited times.
Define certain national and international crimes, including piracy, crimes at sea, and offenses against the law of nations.
Create lower federal courts and shape the federal judiciary, including the size of the Supreme Court, within constitutional limits.
Declare war, fund the military, and regulate the armed forces.
Govern the District of Columbia and certain federal properties, including the power to delegate local authority to D.C.’s elected government—or limit it by law.
Pass laws needed to carry out federal powers through the “necessary and proper” clause.

For a closer look at war powers, see Who Decides When the United States Goes to War?

Congressional powers are not suggestions. A president enforces laws, administers programs, and makes policy choices within legal limits. But the president cannot simply replace Congress’s judgment with executive orders because he dislikes the law Congress passed.

When Congress fails to use those powers, that is also a choice.

Congress writes the laws

The president can propose laws. The president can praise them, attack them, veto them, sign them, ignore political norms around them, or claim credit for them.

But Congress writes the laws to carry out its constitutional powers.

Article I, Section 1, says Congress has “all legislative powers.” That means federal lawmaking belongs to the House and Senate, not to the president alone.

Article I, Section 7, lays out the basic path for bills: Congress passes them, the president signs or vetoes them, and Congress may override a veto with enough votes.

Article II, Section 3, says the president “shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed.” Here, execute means carry out. A president may have discretion to direct agencies, enforce requirements, administer programs, and put federal law into practice.

But the president does not have a general power to ignore, repeal, defund, weaken, or discard laws they dislike.

That distinction is basic, but it is often blurred in public debate. When people say, “the president should do something,” sometimes they are really talking about something only Congress can authorize, fund, change, or stop.

That does not mean presidents are powerless. Far from it. But presidential power usually depends on law, funding, delegation, and enforcement authority. Congress helps build that machinery. Congress can also limit it.

Congress controls the money

One of Congress’s strongest powers is the power of the purse.

The Constitution gives Congress the power to tax, borrow, pay debts, spend for the general welfare, and appropriate money. Revenue bills must begin in the House, and no money may be drawn from the Treasury unless Congress has approved it by law. See Article I, Sections 7, 8, and 9.

Federal programs do not run on speeches. Agencies do not operate on campaign slogans. Wars, courts, investigations, public health programs, disaster relief, veterans’ services, national parks, air traffic control, food safety, Social Security administration, and congressional operations all require money.

Congress decides whether to raise money, how to spend it, and what conditions to attach.

That power is not a minor bookkeeping role. It is one of the main ways Congress defines what the federal government can actually do.

A president may request money. A president may pressure lawmakers. A president may threaten a veto. But the Constitution does not give the president a personal checkbook for the federal treasury.

When Congress protects its spending power, it protects representative government.

When Congress allows a president to redirect, freeze, misuse, or ignore money Congress has approved, it weakens one of the most important checks in the constitutional system.

Congress checks the executive branch

Congress also has the power—and the duty—to oversee the executive branch.

That includes hearings, investigations, subpoenas, reports, budget conditions, confirmation questions, and public accountability. Oversight is not supposed to be a partisan hobby, used only when the other party controls the White House. It is part of how Congress makes sure laws are carried out properly.

The Constitution does not put oversight into one neat clause. It flows from Congress’s Article I lawmaking powers and from the Necessary and Proper Clause in Article I, Section 8.

The executive branch is huge. It includes Cabinet departments, law enforcement agencies, military command structures, regulatory offices, grant programs, contractors, inspectors general, and thousands of officials carrying out federal policy.

A president leads the executive branch. But Congress has the authority to ask: What are you doing? Who authorized it? What law allows it? Where did the money come from? Who benefits? Who is harmed? What records prove it?

Those questions are not harassment. They are governance.

Congress creates and limits federal institutions

Congress also creates, names, funds, structures, and limits many federal offices and institutions.

Much of that authority rests on the Necessary and Proper Clause in Article I, Section 8. Congress can create offices, agencies, and institutions by law when they are needed to carry out federal powers. Congress can also define their duties, funding, structure, and limits.

Some are part of the legislative branch, such as the Library of Congress, Congressional Research Service, Congressional Budget Office, Government Accountability Office, Government Publishing Office, and Architect of the Capitol.

Others are federal institutions created by statutes with special structures, duties, boards, names, or missions.

The Kennedy Center is one example. Congress created and named it by law. A president may have influence through appointments and political pressure, but if a name is set by statute, changing it generally requires Congress to change the statute.

The principle applies far beyond one cultural institution. The president may lead the executive branch, but Congress helps define the legal framework within which federal offices and institutions operate.

Congress confirms—or rejects—many top officials

Presidents nominate many senior officials, including Cabinet members, ambassadors, federal judges, and Supreme Court justices. But Article II, Section 2, gives the Senate an advice-and-consent role.

That means the Senate is not supposed to be a rubber stamp. Its role is not merely to ask whether a nominee is loyal to the president. Its job is to ask whether that person is qualified, ethical, lawful, independent enough for the role, and committed to the Constitution.

Consent means the Senate can say yes. It also means the Senate can say no.

Congress also has an advice-and-consent role for treaties negotiated by the president with other countries.

Congress can impeach and remove officials

The impeachment power of Congress is divided among several provisions:

The House has the sole power to impeach under Article I, Section 2.
The Senate has the sole power to try impeachments under Article I, Section 3.
Article II, Section 4, identifies the officials and grounds for removal.

Conviction may also bar that person from holding future federal office.

Impeachment is not a normal policy disagreement. It is a constitutional remedy for serious abuse of public office.

But it exists for a reason: Some misconduct cannot wait for the next election, and some federal officials are not elected at all.

A president cannot pardon an impeachment. A president cannot erase an impeachment conviction. And a president cannot remove members of Congress for using that power.

Congress controls its own rules and officers

Congress also controls much of its own internal machinery.

Article I, Section 5, says each house may determine its own rules, punish its members, and, with a two-thirds vote, expel a member.

Each chamber chooses its leaders. Committees conduct much of the work. Internal officers and staff help the House and Senate function.

That may sound procedural, but procedure can shape power.

For example, the Senate parliamentarian advises on Senate rules and procedure. A president may object to a ruling. A president may pressure senators. A president may complain loudly.

But the president does not run the Senate’s referees.

That matters because Congress cannot remain independent if the executive branch controls the people who interpret congressional rules.

Congress can give power away

There is one more uncomfortable truth.

Congress can weaken itself:

It can pass vague laws that give presidents too much discretion.
It can fail to conduct oversight. It can confirm unqualified loyalists. It can tolerate secrecy.
It can look away from unlawful spending.
It can treat constitutional duties as partisan inconveniences.
It can let emergency powers become routine. It can complain about executive overreach while quietly benefiting from it.

When that happens, presidential power grows not only because presidents seize it but also because Congress allows it.

That is dangerous, no matter which party controls the White House.

A Congress that surrenders power to a president from its own party may later discover that the power is still gone when the other party wins.

Why this matters to citizens

That is why civic pressure cannot focus only on the White House.

Presidents matter. Elections matter. Executive orders matter. Courts matter.

But members of Congress matter too.

They can write laws. Fund programs. Block spending. Demand records. Hold hearings. Reject nominees. Expose misconduct. Protect agencies. Defend courts. Declare war or refuse to authorize it. Impeach officials. And set limits the president must obey.

Or they can fail to do those things.

When Congress has power but does not use it, voters should know where the responsibility lies.

The Constitution does not make Congress helpless.

Politics sometimes does. And politics can change.

Related Resources at Plainly, Garbl

Contact Information: Washington’s U.S. Senators and Representatives
Phone calls are recommended. Or send an email using the contact form on their website.
How to Track What Congress Actually Does
Follow bills, votes, hearings, committees, and other congressional action.
Suggested Text for Writing Email Messages to Elected Officials
Use or adapt sample language for emails. The same points can also work as a script for phone calls.

Subscribe now

🏛️ Who Decides When America Goes to War?

Gary B. Larson — Fri, 05 Jun 2026 17:02:04 GMT

War is not supposed to be one-person government.

That may sound obvious. But every time U.S. presidents use military force without clear approval from Congress, the country has to relearn one of the Constitution’s basic lessons: The power over war is divided on purpose.

I’ve been alive since 1950. In all that time, Congress has never formally declared war, even as the United States has fought in Korea, Vietnam, the Persian Gulf, Afghanistan, Iraq, and elsewhere.

That history is why the constitutional division of power still matters, not as a civics lesson but as a safeguard.

The president is commander in chief. That matters. A president must be able to respond quickly to attacks, threats, and emergencies.

But the Constitution gives Congress the power to declare war, raise and support armies, provide and maintain a navy, regulate the armed forces, and control military funding. Those powers are not decorative. They are part of our government’s system of checks and balances.

That is why congressional action over Iran matters.

On June 3, 2026, the House passed a war powers resolution seeking to require President Trump to withdraw U.S. forces from hostilities with Iran unless Congress authorizes continued military action. The vote was 215-208, with four Republicans joining Democrats.

The measure now depends on Senate action. If it passes both chambers, Trump could veto it, and Congress would need a two-thirds vote in both the House and Senate to override the veto.

If Congress cannot override a veto, the resolution would not force a legal change. But the vote would still matter politically. It would show congressional resistance, put lawmakers on record, and help define the public debate over the legal and democratic support for military action.

That is the larger constitutional question: Who gets to decide when the United States goes to war?

The answer is not simple. But it is not mysterious either. The Constitution divides war powers for a reason, even if modern practice has blurred the lines.

Over time, power has shifted toward presidents. Broad authorizations helped. So did emergency laws, defense spending bills, and congressional hesitation. Formal declarations of war became rare.

But the core principle remains: War power is shared because war is too dangerous to entrust to one person.

Related: For a broader plain-English guide to Congress’s constitutional powers beyond war and military authority, see What Congress Controls That Presidents Don’t.

What the Constitution says about war powers

The Constitution splits war-related power between Congress and the president.

Congress decides whether to formally authorize war.
Article I, Section 8, gives Congress the power “to declare War.” In plain English: Formal war is not supposed to begin on presidential authority alone.

Congress creates, funds, and regulates the military.
Congress may raise and support armies, provide and maintain a navy, make rules for the armed forces, call forth the militia, and organize, arm, and discipline the militia. It also controls spending, which gives it enormous practical power over military action.

The president is commander in chief.
Article II, Section 2, makes the president commander in chief of the Army and Navy, and of state militias when called into federal service. That means the president directs military operations, commands forces, and can respond quickly to attacks or emergencies.

States have very limited war powers.
Article I, Section 10, largely takes war-making away from individual states. States may not keep troops or ships of war in peacetime without Congress’ consent, and they may not engage in war unless actually invaded or facing imminent danger that allows no delay.

The built-in tension

The problem is that modern military action often falls between the categories the Constitution names most clearly.

Without a declaration of war, a president might authorize military action as a limited strike, drone attack, naval deployment, cyber operation, defense of U.S. forces, or support for an ally.

Any one of those actions may be described as short of war—until it expands, continues, or draws the U.S. deeper into conflict.

That built-in tension has grown as modern military action has become faster, sometimes secret, more global, more technological, and less likely to begin with a formal declaration of war.

Congress may object, but too often it’s after the fact.

How later laws changed the balance

Over time, Congress has passed laws that both limit and expand presidential power. Some were meant to restore congressional authority. Others gave presidents broader tools to respond to threats, impose sanctions, aid allies, conduct surveillance, or use force under specific authorizations.

The result is a system that still rests on constitutional checks and balances. But it often operates through statutes, funding bills, emergency declarations, and congressional authorizations rather than formal declarations of war.

The War Powers Resolution

After the Vietnam War, Congress passed the War Powers Resolution of 1973 over President Nixon’s veto. Its purpose was to restore Congress’ role in decisions about sending U.S. forces into hostilities.

The law says the president may introduce U.S. armed forces into hostilities only under three conditions: a declaration of war, specific statutory authorization, or a national emergency arising from an attack on the United States, its territories, possessions, or armed forces.

The law also requires presidents to consult with Congress “in every possible instance,” report to Congress when forces are introduced into hostilities, and generally end the deployment within 60 days, with a possible 30-day withdrawal period, unless Congress authorizes continued action.

The problem is enforcement. Presidents of both parties have often resisted the law’s limits while still filing reports under it or “consistent with” it. That careful wording signals compliance without conceding control.

Authorizations for Use of Military Force

Instead of formal declarations of war, Congress now usually passes Authorizations for Use of Military Force, or AUMFs.

The 2001 AUMF after the Sept. 11 attacks became the legal basis for years of military action against terrorist groups and related forces. The 2002 Iraq AUMF authorized force against Iraq. Both show how broad authorizations can stretch far beyond the moment that produced them.

AUMFs give Congress a role, but they can also give presidents wide room to act if the language is vague or left in place too long.

Military funding laws

Congress funds the armed forces through defense authorization bills, appropriations bills, emergency spending, and other measures.

That gives Congress a powerful tool. It can fund military action, limit it, condition it, or cut off money. But in practice, Congress often hesitates to restrict funding once troops are already deployed. Members do not want to appear to be abandoning service members, even when the real issue is the mission’s legal authorization.

Emergency and sanctions laws

Congress has also passed laws giving presidents broad powers during national emergencies and foreign crises. These laws can allow sanctions, asset freezes, trade restrictions, and other actions short of war.

Those tools can be necessary. But they can also shift power toward the executive branch if Congress does not oversee them carefully.

Military justice and domestic limits

Congress also writes many rules for the military, including military justice. Laws such as the Uniform Code of Military Justice grow out of Congress’ constitutional authority to regulate the armed forces.

At home, laws such as the Posse Comitatus Act generally limit the use of federal troops for domestic law enforcement, while the Insurrection Act allows military involvement in certain domestic crises.

Those laws reflect another constitutional concern: Military power should remain under civilian control and should not become a tool of domestic intimidation.

How the courts have affected war powers

Courts have not given the country one neat war-powers formula. But several Supreme Court cases matter.

In Little v. Barreme, the court held that presidential military orders could not override limits Congress had set by law. That early case stands for a basic principle: Even in military affairs, presidents must follow statutes.

In the Civil War Prize Cases, the court recognized that a president may respond when an actual armed conflict or emergency already exists. That strengthened emergency presidential power, but it did not give presidents unlimited authority to start wars.

In Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer, the court rejected President Truman’s seizure of steel mills during the Korean War. Justice Robert Jackson’s famous framework remains central: Presidential power is strongest when Congress authorizes it, uncertain when Congress is silent, and weakest when the president acts against Congress’ expressed will.

In later terrorism and detention cases, including Hamdi v. Rumsfeld and Boumediene v. Bush, the court recognized that Congress and the president may have broad wartime powers, but constitutional rights do not disappear.

What citizens should watch

The Iran debate is not only about Iran.

It is also about whether decisions of war and peace still require public debate, legal authority, and democratic consent. Citizens should pay attention to the questions Congress asks and the questions it avoids:

Has Congress clearly authorized military force?
Has the president reported to Congress as required?
Are U.S. forces already in hostilities?
Is Congress debating the mission before or after the shooting starts?
Are lawmakers willing to use their funding power, or only issue statements?
Are old authorizations being stretched to cover new conflicts?

The Constitution does not make the president powerless in war. But it also does not make the president a king.

War is too grave for autopilot. And it is far too grave for one-person rule.

Related Resources in Plainly, Garbl

Global Governance, International Law, and Accountability
Advocacy organizations focused on international law, sovereignty, and democratic limits on power

Peace, Defense Spending, and Nuclear Arms Control
Advocacy organizations focused on de-escalation, restraint, and arms reduction

Subscribe now

🏛️ How to Track What Congress Actually Does

Gary B. Larson — Thu, 23 Oct 2025 17:01:37 GMT

Even in gridlock, the lights don’t all go out on Capitol Hill.

Whether it’s a government shutdown or typical partisan gridlock, it can look like nothing’s happening in Congress.

But as usual in most sessions, most of Congress’s machinery keeps turning: Staff draft legislation, committees prep hearings, leadership negotiates language, and procedural votes still occur.

Knowing how to track those moves matters precisely because the process is always slow, messy, and easy to ignore. It helps you see who’s doing their job, who’s leading, who’s playing politics, and where compromise and solutions might eventually come from.

It’s one of the simplest ways to cut through the fog.

The tools below show how to follow the work—not just the talk—of your elected officials.

Why it matters

Silence hides activity. Committee votes, nominations, and procedural motions continue even when funding stalls.
Budgets return. Every shutdown ends with a deal; tracking past votes shows who blocked what and who brokered it.
Records speak. Members’ voting histories reveal patterns that campaign speeches can’t erase.

Two clear, reliable tools

Congress.gov—the official Library of Congress site.
- Use the search box to find a bill or topic.
- Click “Actions” to see every step: introduction, hearings, floor votes.
- Select “All Actions” for a complete timeline, or “Roll Call Votes” for names and numbers.
- Results link directly to the House Clerk and Senate records.
GovTrack.us —an independent tracker that turns raw data into plain language.
- Create a free account to follow your representatives or specific issues.
- Set up alerts to see when new bills are filed or when a vote is scheduled.
- Each lawmaker’s page shows how often they vote with their party and which bills they’ve sponsored.

Both draw from the same public data; GovTrack just adds visuals and explanations.

How to start

Look up your two senators and your representative.
Click “Votes” on each profile.
Skim recent votes on spending or procedural motions.
Note whether they were present, absent, or abstained.
Save or share any vote you want to question or thank them for.

Tips for staying informed

Sign up for weekly vote summaries from either site.
Follow committee schedules on Congress.gov. Most hearings are streamed live.
Cross-check media headlines with official vote tallies before reacting or sharing.

The bigger picture

Tracking votes isn’t glamorous, but it’s steady work, exactly what democracy needs when government grinds to a halt. Every roll call, even on a “procedural” motion, shows where your representatives stand.

Knowing that gives you power when they claim otherwise.

Stay engaged

To contact your members of Congress directly, visit U.S. Senators and Representatives Contact Info.

If you want to go further, a few groups promote transparency and civic accountability:

Project On Government Oversight (POGO). An independent watchdog that investigates waste, corruption, and abuse of power in federal agencies and defense spending. It pushes for transparency and stronger oversight laws.
OpenSecrets.org. A nonpartisan research group that tracks money in politics—campaign contributions, lobbying, and personal finances of lawmakers — to show how money influences policy decisions.
League of Women Voters. A grassroots civic organization that encourages informed participation in government, advocates for fair elections and voting rights, and provides nonpartisan voter education.

These organizations track spending, lobbying, and election reform so you can keep the light on the process long after the cameras move on.

Subscribe now

🏛️ The U.S. Constitution and the Judicial Branch

Gary B. Larson — Wed, 02 Jul 2025 17:02:24 GMT

‘A government of laws, not of men’—a founding principle expressed by John Adams, 1780

These foundational documents and the institutions that interpret them still shape every debate about freedom, justice, and the role of government today. Understanding them is the first step to holding power accountable—and ensuring it serves the people.

America's Founding Documents

The Constitution of the United States—National Archives

The definitive source for the U.S. Constitution, hosted by the National Archives. Includes a high-resolution image and full transcription, beginning with the iconic Preamble—a statement of purpose for the U.S. government:

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

This page also links to other founding documents and amendments:

The Bill of Rights. The first 10 amendments protecting individual liberties
Amendments 11-27. Later constitutional changes expanding rights,
clarifying government powers, and addressing key historical events
The Declaration of Independence. The original call for liberty and equality

Also available on this site: the Articles of Confederation, Federalist Papers, and more.

The Constitution in Plain Language

A reader-friendly explanation of the Constitution’s articles and amendments, written in clear, everyday language. Ideal for those who want to understand without legal jargon.

Also worth exploring:

Constitution Annotated, Congress.gov — Analysis and interpretation of the U.S. Constitution
Interactive Constitution, National Constitution Center — Featuring scholarly insights from diverse legal experts

The Annenberg Guide to the U.S. Constitution

This interactive guide presents the full text of the Constitution alongside plain language explanations of each article and amendment. While designed for students, it's one of the most accessible tools available for readers of any age.

A clear, reliable way to understand what the Constitution says—and what it means.

Supreme Court of the United States—Official Website

The official source for decisions, opinions, court calendars, and rules of the highest court in the land. Though formal in tone, the site includes:

Searchable opinions and decisions
Oral argument schedules and audio
Justices’ biographies and court history

A reliable way to track constitutional interpretations and rulings that shape national law.

U.S. Constitution, Article III
“Section. 1. The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour ….”

Understanding the Courts—Federal and State Judicial Systems

Structure of the Federal Courts–U.S. Courts

This official site explains how the federal court system works—from district courts to the Supreme Court. It’s a solid overview and includes simple charts and links to educational materials.

Structure of the State Courts

State courts, meanwhile, handle the vast majority of legal cases in the U.S., but their structures vary from state to state. Unfortunately, there’s no single website that clearly explains all 50 systems.

Best advice—Visit your state’s official court website:

In Washington state
Or search online: “[Your State] court system” or “court structure chart”
These sites may not be fancy, but they’re usually the most accurate source for how your state judiciary is organized and how to find local courts and case types.

Other Resources

Executive Overreach and Abuse of Power

A ranked guide to organizations resisting authoritarianism and defending democratic

Justice Reform and Legal Accountability

A ranked guide to advocacy groups promoting independent, ethical courts.

Legal Resistance for Justice

A ranked guide to legal groups challenging anti-democratic policies and abuses of power.

Bill of Rights: Due Process, Equal Protection, Habeas Corpus

A ranked guide to advocacy groups defending core constitutional protections

Freedoms of Speech, Press, and Assembly

A ranked guide to organizations safeguarding free expression and civic participation.

If you find this resource helpful, please share it with friends.

Get new posts from Plainly, Garbl delivered to your inbox.

Subscribe now

🏛️ Contacting Washington State Officials & Key Departments

Gary B. Larson — Wed, 25 Jun 2025 15:02:41 GMT

Looking to take action or stay informed about what’s happening in Washington? This guide helps you contact elected officials, track legislation, and advocate for what matters—all in one place.

Also below are links to ranked guides of advocacy groups in Washington, the Puget Sound area, and the Olympic Peninsula.

🏛️ Washington State Legislature

📍 Structure:

49 state senators (one per district)

98 state representatives (two per district)

🔎 Find Your District (at this link)

📬 Contact Your Legislators:

How to send messages

Email/phone lookup

Leave a message: 📞 1-800-562-6000

🗓️ Legislative Sessions:

Regular: January–April (odd years), January–March (even years)

Special: As needed

📢 Get Involved:

Testify (virtually or in person)

Track bills

Submit public comments on committee bills

🧑‍⚖️ Governor and Statewide Elected Officials

To send them emails, use the Contact Form on their websites.

👤 Governor BOB FERGUSON

Leads the state, proposes laws, and manages state agencies.

📞 (360) 902-4111

📢 Join an advisory board or commission

👤 Lieutenant Governor DENNY HECK

Presides over the Senate, chairs economic development initiatives.

📞 (360) 786-7715

📢 Focus: Economic development, higher ed, international trade

👤 Secretary of State STEVE HOBBS

Oversees elections, archives, business filings, and charities.

📞 (360) 902-4150

📢 Involvement:

Watch election security, advocate for voting rights

File public records requests

Verify nonprofits

👤 Attorney General NICK BROWN

Handles consumer protection, civil rights, and public safety.

📞 (360) 753-6200

📢 Involvement:

File complaints (scams, fraud)

Public comments (legal settlements, investigations)

Follow lawsuits on rights, climate, health care

👤 Treasurer MIKE PELLICCIOTTI

Manages state finances, investments, and public debt.

📞 (360) 902-9000

📢 Focus: Sustainable investments, infrastructure funding

👤 Auditor PAT MCCARTHY

Audits government agencies for fraud, waste, and transparency.

📞 (360) 902-0370

📢 Involvement:

Report waste or abuse (confidential tip line)

Read local government/school district audit reports

👤 Commissioner of Public Lands DAVE UPTHEGROVE

Manages state forests, wildfire response, public lands, and conservation.

📞 (360) 902-4111

📢 Involvement:

Comment on land-use plans

Volunteer for wildfire prevention, reforestation

👤 Superintendent of Public Instruction CHRIS REYKDAL

Oversees K-12 public schools.

📞 (360) 725-6000

📢 Involvement:

Join state/local school advisory groups

Advocate for curriculum and funding

👤 Insurance Commissioner PATTY KUDERER

Regulates health, auto, and home insurance companies.

📞 (360) 902-4111

📢 Involvement:

File consumer complaints

Comment on insurance rate proposals

🏘️ Local Government and Advocacy

🔎 Find Local Officials:

Washington State Association of Counties

Association of Washington Cities

📣 Stay Informed and Take Action

Advocacy Groups for Activists

Washington State

A ranked guide to organizations shaping progressive change across Washington state

Olympic Peninsula

A ranked guide to organizations working for conservation, community, and justice on the Peninsula

Puget Sound Area

A ranked guide to organizations promoting environmental justice and equity across the Puget Sound area

Share
If you find this resource useful, please share it with friends.

Subscribe
Get new posts from Plainly, Garbl delivered to your inbox.

Subscribe now

🏛️ How to Contact Federal Officials—and Be Heard

Gary B. Larson — Mon, 09 Jun 2025 22:01:22 GMT

Reaching out to the executive branch of the federal government can make a difference—but only if your message gets to the right place and the right people. Here’s a plain-language guide to help you take action effectively.

Separate posts in Plainly, Garbl provide contact information for U.S. Cabinet-level Departments and the Executive Office of the President and Washington's U.S. Senators and Representatives.

Step 1: Know Your Issue—and Who Handles It

Big Picture? Contact the cabinet secretary for that department. Your message won’t reach them directly, but public pressure can still make an impact.
Specific Program? Contact the agency that runs the program. They have the power to make changes.

Examples:

For veterans’ health care: Contact the Veterans Health Administration.
For airline safety: Contact the Federal Aviation Administration.
For national parks: Contact the National Park Service.

Step 2: Double Up for Greater Impact

Send your message to both the cabinet secretary’s office and the agency.
Also send a copy to members of Congress, especially your senators or representative and members on related committees.

Step 3: Use Congress to Strengthen Your Voice

Congress oversees federal agencies and can push them to respond.
If your issue fits a lawmaker’s priorities, they may speak up for you.

Step 4: Choose the Right Message Strategy

CC (Carbon Copy): Let the agency know you’re also contacting Congress—can add pressure but might put them on the defensive.
BCC (Blind Copy): Keep your message to Congress private—gives them the option to follow up quietly.

Step 5: Make Your Message Work

Contact lawmakers on relevant committees.
Don’t forget local offices—they can sometimes help more quickly than D.C. staff.
Follow up if you don’t hear back.

Final Tips

Start with the right office.
Be specific and respectful.
Loop in your congressional reps if needed.
Email is usually best for executive branch agencies. Your message is more likely to be read, tracked, and shared than if you call.

By being clear, persistent, and strategic, your message has a better chance of being read—and making a difference.

🏛️ Contact Information: Washington's U.S. Senators and Representatives

Gary B. Larson — Mon, 09 Jun 2025 22:01:09 GMT

At their websites, you can also subscribe to their newsletter and get information on various issues, their services, office locations in Washington, D.C., and Washington state, recent votes on legislation, committee assignments, postal mailing address, and more.

To write your members of Congress through email, use the contact form on their website. Phone calls are recommended.

The representatives for districts 4 and 5 are Republicans. The state's other members of Congress are Democrats.

At the end of this list is contact information for the Democratic Party minority leaders in the Senate and House of Representatives.

U.S. Senators

Senator Patty Murray

Office Phone: (202) 224-2621

Official Website

Senator Maria Cantwell

Office Phone: (202) 224-3441

Official Website

U.S. Representatives

To find your representative based on your home address, visit the House of Representatives website. Also, each district name below links to a PDF map from the Washington State Redistricting Commission. These official maps show the boundaries of the 10 congressional districts, based on the 2020 census and in effect for the 2024–2032 elections.

Representative Suzan DelBene, District 1

Office Phone: (202) 225-6311
Official Website

Representative Rick Larsen, District 2

Office Phone: (202) 225-2605

Official Website

Representative Marie Gluesenkamp Perez, District 3

Office Phone: (202) 225-3536

Official Website

Representative Dan Newhouse, District 4

Office Phone: (202) 225-5816

Official Website

Representative Michael Baumgartner, District 5

Office Phone: (202) 225-2006

Official Website

Representative Emily Randall, District 6

Office Phone: (202) 225-5916

Official Website

Representative Pramila Jayapal, District 7

Office Phone: (202) 225-3106

Official Website

Representative Kim Schrier, District 8

Office Phone: (202) 225-7761

Official Website

Representative Adam Smith, District 9

Office Phone: (202) 225-8901

Official Website

Representative Marilyn Strickland, District 10

Office Phone: (202) 225-9740

Official Website

Democratic Party Minority Leaders in the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives

It's useful to contact minority leaders Schumer and Jeffries when calling or writing your state and district members of Congress. They wield significant organizational and persuasive power over Democratic actions in the Senate and House.

They influence the decisions of your senators and representative. Including them in your communications may help ensure they consider the needs and interests of the people they lead - and their constituents from across the nation.

Charles Schumer, Senate Minority Leader

Office Phone: (202) 224-6542
Official Website

Hakeem Jeffries, House Minority Leader

Office Phone: (202) 225-5936
Official Website

Information sourced from the official websites of the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives.

Share
If you find this resource useful, please share it with friends.

Subscribe
Get new posts from Plainly, Garbl delivered to your inbox.

Subscribe now

🏛️ U.S. Cabinet-level Departments and the Executive Office of the President

Gary B. Larson — Mon, 09 Jun 2025 22:00:57 GMT

Here’s information for each U.S. cabinet-level department and the Executive Office of the President, including the department head, contact details, and key agencies. Look for contact forms on the websites where you can send emails.

Trump's cabinet secretaries are loyal only to him, so contacting them and the departments and agencies they manage may have limited impact.

Still, websites for the departments have contact forms and email addresses for public communication. Response times will vary due to the volume of inquiries and the priority given to public involvement.

Separate Plainly, Garbl posts provide advice for How to Contact Federal Officials—and Be Heard and Contact Information for Washington State's U.S. Senators and Representatives.